The manuscripts were organized into five primary categories: Author, article grouping, original article subtype, prosthetic division, and statistical analysis.
Authors working at private organizations exhibited a more pronounced publication pattern than their peers in government institutions. Publications with four or more authors were more prevalent during the period from 2016 to 2020. Original research papers took precedence, with case reports emerging afterward. During the 2016-2020 period, a systematic review revealed a progressive increase in comparison with the preceding 2011-2015 period. An appreciably greater number of
In the published experimental studies, the statistical analysis involved a comparison of average values. 740 Y-P manufacturer An upswing in publications on materials and technology was observed, which was followed by articles on implants in the prosthetic section.
The analysis of the journal's progress characterizes involved researchers, explores research types and statistical methods, highlights key research areas, and pinpoints national trends in prosthodontic research.
To highlight the future course of action for authors and journals, publication trends will center on the research thrust areas and the nature of research within a particular specialty, identifying the gaps and suggesting a pathway forward. This resource enables researchers to compare their work with international prosthodontic trends, thus guiding prospective authors towards priority areas of the journal, improving their acceptance chances.
Research trends in publications will concentrate on crucial research areas and the character of research within the field, revealing research gaps and delineating future strategies for authors and journals. This comparison with international publication trends in prosthodontics informs potential authors on the journal's priorities, allowing for research focused on those areas to boost chances of acceptance.
This study investigates the impact of three diverse drilling techniques on implant site preparation, with the ultimate goal of enhancing primary stability in early-loaded single posterior maxillary implants.
Employing early loading protocols, a total of 36 dental implants were strategically placed in the maxillary posterior region to replace one or more missing teeth in this study. The allocation of patients into three groups was random. For group I, an undersized drilling method was utilized during the drilling process; group II adopted bone expanders for the drilling procedure; and group III used the osseodensification (OD) technique for their drilling. A schedule of clinical and radiographic assessments was performed on patients at set times: immediately, 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgical intervention. The statistical analysis process encompassed all clinical and radiographic criteria.
Group I implants all displayed stability and success, contrasting with the survival of eleven out of twelve implants in both groups II and III. In all three groups, there was no significant change in peri-implant soft tissue health and marginal bone loss (MBL) throughout the entirety of the study; conversely, a statistically significant difference was present in implant stability and insertion torque measures between groups I, II, and III at the time of implant installation.
Employing an undersized drilling protocol, akin to the implant's geometry, for implant bed preparation yields high initial implant stability, obviating the requirement for supplementary instruments or additional expense.
Dental implants in the posterior maxilla can be early loaded via an undersized drilling technique, improving the initial stability of the implant.
To enhance primary stability in the posterior maxilla, dental implants can be subjected to early loading using an undersized drilling approach.
The research's primary goal was to analyze the permeability of restorative materials to microbes, employing an antibacterial primer as an intracoronal barrier, or omitting it.
Fifty-five single-rooted teeth, extracted for this study, are part of the dataset. Employing gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, the canals were cleaned, shaped, and obturated, all at the established working length. After 2 millimeters of coronal gutta-percha were excised, the teeth were subjected to a 24-hour incubation process. Employing intracoronary orifice barriers, teeth were categorized into groups: I (Clearfil Protect Bond/Clearfil AP-X), II (Xeno IV/Clearfil AP-X), III (Chemflex, glass ionomer), IV (positive control, no barrier), and V (negative control, no barrier, inoculated with sterile broth). Microleakage was quantified using a sterile two-chamber bacterial technique.
It stood as an indicator of microbial life processes. A statistical evaluation encompassed the proportion of leaked samples, the duration of sample leakage, and the colony-forming unit (CFU) counts within the compromised samples.
No significant difference in bacterial penetration was detected across the three materials after 120 days of application as intracoronal orifice barriers. This investigation further suggests that the leaked Clearfil Protect Bond sample demonstrated the minimum average colony-forming unit count (43 CFUs), followed by Xeno IV (61 CFUs) and, finally, glass ionomer cement (GIC) with 63 CFUs.
The three experimental antibacterial primers, when employed as intracoronal barriers, exhibited improved performance, according to this investigation. However, the combination of Clearfil Protect Bond and an antibacterial primer proved effective in reducing bacterial leakage when functioning as an intracoronal orifice barrier.
The success of endodontic treatment relies on the capacity of intracoronal orifice barriers to successfully impede microleakage, a key determinant of treatment outcomes. This strategy empowers clinicians to implement successful antibacterial therapy for endodontic anaerobes.
Intracoronal orifice barriers' effectiveness in endodontic treatment is contingent upon their capacity to obstruct microleakage, a property inextricably linked to material attributes. Clinicians can effectively treat endodontic anaerobes with antibacterial therapy using this method.
The reconstruction of a deficient lateral alveolar ridge width with a cortico-cancellous block allograft was clinically and computed tomographically (CT) assessed before dental implant placement.
Ten patients having atrophic mandibular ridges, whose implant placement demanded preceding bone augmentation, were randomly selected, and corticocancellous block allografts were employed to restore the lateral ridge. Preoperative and six-month postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and clinical evaluations were carried out on the grafted site. Subsequent to six months, surgical re-entry surgery was completed to accommodate the placement of dental implants.
The six-month evaluation period confirmed that all the block allografts had become fully integrated into the host tissue. All grafts, clinically, were found to possess a firm rm texture, exhibiting robust incorporation and vascularization. An increase in bone width was apparent through both clinical and CT imaging analysis. Initial stability of the dental implants was deemed satisfactory.
As a prominent grafting material, bone-block allografts are suitable for managing lateral ridge defects.
During surgical procedures requiring precision and accuracy, this bone graft provides a safe and convenient alternative to autogenous grafts, particularly in areas designed for implant placement.
In the context of precise and meticulous surgical procedures, this bone graft serves as a practical substitute for autografts, enabling its safe application in implant placement zones.
To quantify and compare screw loosening in gold and titanium alloy abutment screws, without the influence of any cyclic loading, this study was executed.
The 20 implant fixture screw samples encompassed 10 gold abutment screws from Osstem and 10 titanium alloy abutment screws, sourced from Genesis. brain pathologies With a surveyor as a guide, the implant fixtures' insertion path was preserved as they were placed into the acrylic resin material. In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, initial torque was applied using a calibrated torque wrench and a hex driver. Lines, one vertical and the other horizontal, were drawn above the hex driver and the resin block. A standardized acrylic block position was established by a putty index on a fixed table, and a tripod-mounted digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) was oriented with its horizontal arm parallel to the floor and at right angles to the acrylic box. Pictures were taken promptly after the initial torque was applied, as directed by the manufacturer, and a further 10 minutes later. The re-torque for gold abutment screws was 30 N cm, while 35 N cm was specified for titanium alloy abutment screws. Re-torquing was followed by a repeat of the photographic session in the same position, one time immediately and another three hours later. Genetics behavioural Using the Fiji-win64 analysis software, the angulations in each uploaded photograph were quantified.
The gold and titanium alloy abutment screws, after initial torquing, displayed a pattern of screw loosening. A considerable variation in the amount of screw loosening was observed between gold and titanium alloy abutments after initial torquing, and no change in abutment position was noted after a subsequent three-hour re-tightening.
For the preservation of preload and the reduction of screw loosening, the re-torquing of both gold and titanium alloy abutment screws following a ten-minute initial torquing period is habitually performed, even before applying any load to the implant fixture.
Gold abutment screws might exhibit a more effective preload-holding capacity than titanium alloys following initial tightening, and re-torquing after approximately 10 minutes is often needed to counteract settling in everyday dental practice.
Re-torquing gold abutment screws after ten minutes, despite potential initial preload retention advantages compared to titanium alloy screws, might still be a needed step in preventing settling during a standard clinical procedure.